Critical Thinking Evaluation

Critial Evaluation of an pedantic Source NMN Capella University ED5001 Critial Evaluation of an Academic Source This paper is a faultfinding evaluation regarding the suitability of using scholarly conditions as an academician source. We will analyze the Critical Thinking An Extended Definition that discusses versatile scholar definiitons on what is critical thinking and the process of critical thinking. Checklist for Critical Evaluation Peer Review Is the name peer reviewed? This condition is a peer review. Is the article primary, secondary, or tertiary?This article is tertiary. Main Issue What is the briny skip or problem the write is instructioning on in this article? The main issue that the author is focusing on is the idea that in the academic serviceman the word critical thinking is utilize frequently, only the way it is localised is so broad that at times it is hard to apply these definitions. It seems that respective(a) scholars postulate a different definitio n for critical thinking, and in most cases the definitions are lacking in terminuss of giving direction on the process of thinking critically. Significance of the IssueDiscuss the significance of the issue which is the focus of the article. The significance of the issue in this article is the author is trying to tell those in the academic world that the idea of critical thinking is so broad that those in the mingled disciplines need to see in that location needs to be continuous discussion regarding the idea of critical thinking. This idea that on that points no one answer with reagrds to defining critical thinking. Why is it important? I think its important beca make use of agree to the article that the different disciplines have a different way of looking at critical thinking.This main reason is why the author feels that everyone should discuss this idea of critical thinking on a continuos base. Having discussions on a continuous basis allows scholars from various disciplines to look at varying perspectives of critical thinking that they wouldnt otherwise see in their own discipline. On what do you storey your assertions regarding its significance? I base my assertions from the different definitions of critical thinking from various scholars from different backgrounds that the author discussed. Authors PurposeWhat is the authors main purpose(s) in writing the article? The main purpose of the author writing this article is to get up the discussion between scholars of different academic disciplines regarding the definition of critical thinking and the ways it can be applied. Authors Point of View What is the authors point of view? The authors point of view is that critical thinking has a broad a definition and can be applied in different ways depending on how the person is looking at it. Conceptual asylum What are the main concepts presented in the article?The main concepts presented in this article first the idea that theres no clear and precise defin ition of critical thinking. The second main concept that I found in the article is the idea of knowing and asking quality questions. The other concept that I got from the article is the idea that the term critical thinking has different meaning in various contexts. What schooling is the author using, and what is its relationship to the main issue? The information that the author is using is to look at various scholars from different disciplines definition and application of the term critical thinking.Does the information used appear relevant, significant, valid, and sufficient for the conclusions being raddled? Yes I believe it is relevant, significant, and sufficient enough to be used to draw a conclusion. Do you have enough information to determine whether the information is relevant, significant, and valid? Yes I do, because the author has provided us with how different disciplines define and use the term critical thinking. The author is able to show us how broad and unclear th e term critical thinking is. Authors Assumptions What unstated assumptions is the author making in the article?The unstated assumptions that the other is making the article is the idea that all academic disciplines use critical thinking as a basis in their field of study. Another assumption that I think is being made is that scholars in various disciplines dont agree across the board with regards to defining critical thinking and its application. Authors Conclusions What conclusion(s) are being drawn by the author? The author I think is concluding that this article will help speakers, scholars, listeners etc. to not only register the term critical thinking better, but also help them to use the term in academic literature.What are the implications of the conclusion(s)? The implication of the conclusion is the situation that the author is making the assumption that a lot of people dont understand and/or know how to use the term in general especially in academic literature. Problem A reas What emf problems do you see in the authors reasoning? I thinking that the author might be a little bias in making the assumptuion that just because the term critical thinking definition is so broad that most scholars dont discuss with each other in order to understand the context that theyre using the term.What potential problems are there with the authors use of information? The author doesnt in reality show how he determined the various scholar definitions he chose to use in making his various points. You dont know if his selections were subjective or objective. What point of view is ignored by this author, or has not been considered in dealing with the issue? Summary of Critical Evaluation Would you use the article in support of your own writing? I dont think I would use this article in my own writing. Why or why not?The reason I wouldnt use this article because it seems to be a one-sided argument, and the author seems to make a lot of assumptions about what goes on in th e academic world in terms of using the word critical thinking. What limitations would you place on its use? The limitations I would place is that the author may have placed too much of his legal opinion in the article. References Capella University. (n. d. ). Critical thinking model. Retrieved from http//media. capella. edu/CourseMedia/PSYC4900/criticalThinking/criticalThinking_wrapper. asp